SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hmaly who wrote (157113)12/30/2002 7:23:41 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580295
 
And just how much expertise and credibility was he showing there. He professes to be shocked that the reps would dare to use 9/11. Is that really the truth, and if you think it is, you better ask yourself just how much expertise does this guy have. Also, why do the polls favor Hillary. Kerry has already announced his intentions, Hillary hasn't, yet she is the top vote getter. Kerry's message so far has been received by a big yawn.

Hillary has had much greater exposure on the national scene and therefore, has much better name recognition, particularly among women. For the Dems. its critical that a name like Kerry or Edwards, names that have not been tarnished by past politics, come to the surface. They are the only chance that the Dems have a winning in 2004. IMO its too soon for a woman president.

ted



To: hmaly who wrote (157113)12/30/2002 7:45:21 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580295
 
Hillary is not running. Kerry leads new polls, and will lead even more as time goes on. Even tied with Edwards in south Carolina. Kerry is surprisingly strong in the South due to his leadership with McCain on vets issues. By the way, if Hillary tried to run she'd be trounced. Unelectable. same with Lieberman I think. The Clinton era is over.