SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (63778)12/31/2002 12:19:52 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
The settlers as "Fair Game" seems to be the Euro position, although not openly the American one. Don't think it is going to change, Nadine. The idea of the Palestine Terrorists as a client of the Euros also seems to be involved.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (63778)12/31/2002 10:48:48 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
It's one thing to argue against the Stenhall position outlined in this piece (and, by the way, it would help to see the original so one could assess just how accurate the editorial is in picturing Stenhall's position), but it's quite another to argue that critics of the settlement policy are, in some sense, advocating killing settlers. This latter is a Pipes kind of argument. Starting from the premise that if you are not with us, you must be against us, then critics become advocates for the other side. And, as is Pipes desire, a serious attempt to shut down dissent is laid on the table.

This kind of argumentation, in which critics are labeled as advocating murder, as traitors, as whatevers, should be condemned by right and left and middle as incompatible with a vigorous democracy. Whether Israeli, European, or US.