SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (7725)1/2/2003 1:54:36 AM
From: MSIRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
So you are saying without such convertibility no money can be created by the gov't, it must be bonds or notes of some kind. I take it you also say the Fed system, owned and managed by the banks, do not accrue unfair profit or influence to private banks?

That's tricky. It would seem that a note from the gov't is guaranteed by the gov't, whether it produces interest or not. If Japan can issue zero-interest notes, that seems to prove the point that no interest need be accrued.

If so, that's a huge difference in gov't budget burden, and economy, if we eliminate interest on new money-creation, remove the gov't from competing in the bond market, and cut the debt cost of gov't. The banks and brokers wouldn't like it, but the people would.



To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (7725)1/3/2003 9:23:45 AM
From: Wyätt GwyönRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
James Grant's Money of the Mind

i must say i am surprised that somebody who cites Jim Grant as an information source would believe that "there is nothing that rivals American Treasury debt". are you familiar with Grant's recent writings on gold and the dollar, and US govt bonds? of the latter, he calls TIPS the "least bad bond". he is quite bullish on Newmont and quite bearish on the dollar, in my reading of his not-so-subtle arrangement of tea leaves.

regards,
Darfot, holder of TIPS and NEM