SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mannie who wrote (20496)1/2/2003 1:09:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 104155
 
Don't mess with, ah, the United States

BY JAN JARBOE RUSSELL
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST
Thursday, January 2, 2003

If the future of the world seems to you increasingly Texan in substance and style, then don't feel like the Lone Ranger.

You would have to be living under a rock to miss the fact that it is Texas -- not New York or California -- that is now shaping the major events of the world.

The evidence is all around us: TV images of President Bush chopping cedar at his ranch in Crawford, Tom DeLay preparing his return from Houston to Washington as House majority leader, plus the year-end reminders that it was the fall of Houston's Enron that triggered the 2002 white-crime spree.

At the Main Street Place, a souvenir shop in Crawford, tourists from all over the world came in droves during the holidays to buy Bush memorabilia. The best-selling item was a W-shaped ornament in the shape of the Texas Lone Star.

A story in the new issue of The Economist goes so far as to claim, "The future is Texas." The story argues that it was Texas that led the rightward drift of America's politics, the country's newfound nationalism, as well as its enthusiasm for religion and business. "Texas," argues The Economist, "is America on steroids."

Lord helps us, but I believe The Economist is correct. Power has shifted to Texas, as has population (we are the second fastest growing state after Florida, but as everybody knows, Florida can't count) and money.

The ideas that shaped Texas are now shaping the world. For instance, at the battle of San Jacinto in 1836, Texas became the only American state that won its independence by fighting a foreign power alone. To this date, any Texan confronted with an embattled situation around the world will immediately revert to this primal idea of going into battle alone, besieged on all sides, and emerging victorious.

During the first days of Lyndon Johnson's presidency -- faced with the fall of South Vietnam -- Johnson told the National Security Council: "Hell, Vietnam is just like the Alamo. Hell, it's just like if you were down at the gate, and you were surrounded, and you damn well needed somebody. Well by God, I'm going to go -- and I thank the Lord that I've got men who want to go with me."

So when President Bush goes on television and vows that "we shall not retreat" from the battle against terrorism, and will stand alone against the world -- if necessary -- he is reverting to Texas type.

Until OPEC assumed power in the 1970s, the Texas Railroad Commission controlled the price of oil around the world and forced independent producers to abide by rules designed to benefit the largest oil companies. A cynical way to view the coming war with Iraq is that Bush is simply identifying with his God-given right as a Texan to control the supply and the price of oil.

At any rate, now that Texans are speaking for the nation, it's important to pay close attention to what they say.

For instance, earlier this year, DeLay, the new House majority leader, spoke to the First Baptist Church in Pearland. After his talk, an audience member complained that Texas universities do not teach creationism and asked DeLay for his advice. DeLay's solution? He advised the crowd not to send their kids to Texas universities.

His remarks point to the dark side of the Texas boast. If Texas is the future, then the world must be put on notice: Over the years, we have invested much more in brawn than in brains.

Some of that is changing. High-tech companies are flocking to Texas, and the University of Texas has the second-largest endowment in the country, after Harvard. Now if we could only get some of those rich Yankees to invest some of their money in think tanks for Texas, along with some spare change for a few museums and publishing houses.

The hard truth is that many among us -- including the new House majority leader -- don't place a lot of value in book learnin'. As a result, our schools are in crisis, and our prisons are full.

Still, there is a lot to love about our state. If the future of America is Texas, then, as we never tire of saying, "Don't Mess With Texas."
___________________________________________________

Jan Jarboe Russell is a columnist with the San Antonio Express-News. Copyright 2003 King Features Syndicate. E-mail: jjarboe@express-news.net

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: Mannie who wrote (20496)1/2/2003 3:57:30 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 104155
 
scooter-

is he the one that makes clark bars?

it almost makes you nervous to read what he says.
you want to look over your shoulder and make sure
no one who might turn you in is noticing what you're
reading. how ironic is that? ha ha.

he's talking like a sunday school or kindergarten
teacher who is teaching children how to listen to
their own conscience to determine what is right and
wrong... how people should treat other people as
they would want to be treated... what killing is and
why it's not the right thing to do except in cases of
self defense or food gathering. he calls murder, murder...
and mass murder, mass murder... instead of pre-emptive
self-defense.

it's ironic that the mainstream adult population
calls such living by conscience, "naive".
well it isn't naive at all, it's conscientious.
to live and walk the conscientious path is courageous.
it is more dangerous to the individual but it
contributes much more to the security and well being of
society, which in turn (in the long run) benefits the
well being and security of the individual (or at least
our successive generations' individuals).

since the beginning of this new millennium we have
strayed far from the conscientious path. so far that
even those who would seek office to moderate that swing,
in groping for middle ground and enough votes to be
electable, temper their language and actions toward
unconscientious mainstream thought in order not to be
proclaimed "naive" and (by implication) unrealistic.

give me the conscientious man or woman who is guided by
the inner voice. one with the vision of a kinder, more
maturely evolved world who has outgrown the "real" naivete
of either following or attempting to manipulate or fool
the angry and fearful outer voices.

-dances wif wolves