Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: (Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (16322)	1/3/2003 4:58:30 PM
From: David Lawrence	Respond to of 32883

Does it [searches by user] exist if you change to Classic or vice-versa? I've tried both interfaces, with every possible variation of the user ID that I can think of, including the one that used to work, #user-123456. The parameter is being passed along, because zero results are returned when it is used, so it's being treated literally. I don't know why a line or two of logic can't be added to test for #user- or #subject parameters. The data obviously exists in the search index, and the additional overhead would be minimal since the terms would be compared to specific fields. Inquiring minds will probably never know....