Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (3521)	1/3/2003 2:57:51 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

Uh, something's wrong here. I think we're in agreement. :-) I would be inclined to treat 1st and 2nd trimester the same, although I wouldn't scream if abortions were more difficult to obtain then. And I think we agree about the 3rd trimester. I have no problem with banning them then. If a women dilly dallies until then, then she can just take the consequences. Hmmm. You're more reasonable than I thought on this. At least if I understand what you say correctly. Here. This should stir up trouble. :-) Message 18390116