SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (67244)1/3/2003 7:42:26 PM
From: Fred Levine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
I have been reading the Foreign Affairs thread, which I have been banned from, and many intelligent posts don't see the significance of 9/11. I agree with you, Ski.

Keep in mind that the damage was the maximum that they could conceive of, and that they would do more if possible. Their tribal mentality defines all Americans as their enemy and therefore deserving" of retaliation. Bin Laden has stated that, (to paraphrase) "just as they kill us, we shall kill them." It is a holy duty within Islam to commit to the Jihad until the world is converted. Obviously, only a minority of the Muslim world interprets their responsibility this way, and there is much in Islam declaring peace. Indeed, more is emphasized in charity than, arguably, any other religion. Al Queda is real and is a threat. I suspect that the threat has been enlarged for propaganda purposes, but the threat is real.

To repeat, IMO, Bush has gotten the inspectors in and there hasn't been a war. Getting the inspectors in is a tremendous act of containment. War would polarize an increasingly polarized world. Yet, the Israeli bombing of the Iraqi nuclear sites was universally condemned but led to a safer world.

I am concerned that, just as the constant wars with the Arabs have transformed Israel from an idealistic socialist state into a militaristic one, Bush will do the same. If the only tool one has is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Bush seems to have a limited repertoire of responses.

fred



To: skinowski who wrote (67244)1/5/2003 1:27:10 PM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
What you said was:

nukes existed for generations, but the proliferation into the hands of rogue governments and terrorists is a new phenomenon.

I read through the article you posted and it claims some extremists (who, though?) have more than 20 nuclear warheads and are now (in 1999) employing Russian scientists.

So?

I still don't know of a terrorist organization that has nukes. If they had nukes, you think that would keep it a secret? Or would they boast?

of posting quotes in italics

You put this before the quote: <.I.>
(without the dots)

And you put this after the quote: <./.I.>
(without the dots)