SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (337521)1/4/2003 10:37:32 AM
From: dvdw©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Jimmy Carters administration also defined stupidity in this regard. Carter was the father of appeasement, clinton became it's inheritance, and now his wifes favorite state is using nuc's to threaten us. What kind of logic is this? How do you justify providing N Korea with the ability to fuel a nuclear weapon?

What rationalizations can the dems make for this evolving N Korea, N Korea is one of the few remaining legacies of the left.

Someone needs to explain how n korea warrants any technology that allows them to evolve further down this path of nuclear terrorism. Someone needs to explain how n korea has so conveniently entered our news cycle right now, isnt it true that n korea is the legacy of the left? Isnt it true that n korea is crowding itself into current public debate at the beck and call of the left?

Isnt it true that the left hates America, and that all of the current risk is manifest due to the lefts incidious planning for this very event?

The left has a record; we have lesser americans who facilitated the current threat, these lesser americans want power and are prepared to destroy the lives of anyone who stands in their way.

They have enabled their client state, their legacy state at this time, to authenticate their threat to the lives and well being of the rest of us.



To: JDN who wrote (337521)1/5/2003 2:08:23 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769667
 
I don't believe I have yet discussed the issue of civilian authority over the military... or civilian competence in military matters.

That is a wholely different discussion, unrelated to what I have posted.