Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (26845)	1/4/2003 9:27:24 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

>>Now, as far as Palast not being able to secure a document that had a stamp of "Secret" on it, I am astonished at how naive you are about documentation. Tons of documents in the public domain have this stamp on them. It's nothing unusual at all. << Uhmmm, all I'll say is that I know that my clearance level is a hell of a lot higher than yours. The document you provide as proof is from 1962 and is available from the Freedom of Information Act giving release in 17 years (I believe is the length). Show me an actual secret US Government document post 1995, it is you that is naive about secret documents, I'm speaking from actual knowledge. Nice try, but Palast is speaking out of his arse, he doesn't have any knowledge of a 2001 secret FBI document let alone it's "file #', he said that to give credibility to the unaware reading the article. But you bought it; hook, line and stinker (sic). Jim