Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (157417)	1/5/2003 4:24:57 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580595

David Re...A great concept, but unfortunately, totally unworkable. You can't get a lawyer to sue another. That would be true only if you believe lawyers wouldn't be greedy enough to eat their young if they thought there was a buck in it. What would keep lawyers from suing one another , their principles. Ha good one. The problem is contingency fees. I disagree. The problem isn't the fees, it is the total lack of justice in the system. I wouldn't mind so much, if at the end of the day, one could say, justice was served. Nobody can say this is justice. Otherwise, there is no end to the ridiculousness of suits You can bet that the lawyers would come up with ways to limit the lawsuits, if they were held as accountable for their actions, as they are trying to hold everybody else.