Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking - 2003 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike McFarland who wrote (70)	1/5/2003 10:21:12 PM
From: Miljenko Zuanic	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 383

<<And besides, I pointed out in an earlier post that this is the honor system anyway--nobody has to send a check to Ron's cause.>> Than, none has to send a check to anyone’s charity. Than, why contest with pledge? We entered contest with OBLIGATION to forward our pledge, regardless who wins. While his portfolio is subject to interpretation, his charity choice does not fold under spirit if this contest. IF I can not complete my pledge I will exit contest, not at the end ignore my duty. Miljenko

To: Mike McFarland who wrote (70)	1/6/2003 7:04:10 PM
From: rkrw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 383

<<Finally, the penny stock issue--yeah, the rules are clear enough. I would be happy to throw out my CEN.l (CPHAF) penny stock--although I have not year been chastized like Ron has;-)>> I guess I prefer the portfolio's at least have a semblance of reality and be investable. To be honest I think your 100K share purchase at 5 cents is maybe a tad more realistic than Ron's but wouldn't pass muster if I were the judge and jury. Nice to see the positive start to the year. I would venture to guess my porfolio from last years contest saw exactly zero days above break even. I'm sure others were largely the same. Let's hope it lasts!