Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (338253)	1/5/2003 10:59:27 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

My post to you was direct. I think it was clear. I took my time and stuck to direct and no disrespect was intended. I tried to also speak with a riddle. I was not attempting to suggest anything about any delusion you were under. I don't believe that. I was trying to illustrate that this is an issue of style and tolerance. style and tolerance can be a huge or nothing. My posts contain many riddles that will only have meaning to those who have memory of the keys. It may be that those to whom I'm sending the riddle don't see it or get it. To me that's fun. So it would seem I was quite successful in communicating complex ideas. With your feedback and my reply we know each other better. I have known for a long time you have deeply held beliefs to which you remain faithful. I consider none of your deeply held beliefs to be anything less than noble. I did not say correct :-) It takes no brainpower to see clear simple honest consistency. That is a very high compliment. But you have also discerned in my crazy riddle a kindred spirit. That take more brains and more heart. Mostly it about an open mind and an open heart. I do wonder, It seems my writing is attracting a simple minded critics cult. Do you think I could market it..... LOL I was not at any time speaking about your actual style. I was stating there are different styles. As to why you may have asked about delusion, In things political I have spoken to you curtly at times. It's my ways saying I think you are wrong. The only way you could be wrong is that you have missed something IMHO. My short hand is, that stupid or that's stupid thinking. It does not mean I'm right, but I believe I'm right. I may or may not have the time to explain. It's a signal I see a flaw in what you have said. So I think on some political issue that my delusion is more real than your delusion. This is a round about way of saying I know your are not delicate. The only delicate posters here need knights in shining armor.