Ted Re...But what disgusts me most about conpassionate, impassioned, anal retentive conservatives is best examplified by your answer above. You try to be honest and have a reasonable conversation and you get shit back.
Anal retentive conservative, hmmm, what is that? Better or worse than calling a guy an idiot. One would think by now that you would be more conservative using those type of words, as they usually rebound on you, but what the heck, you seem to enjoy the punishment you get back, as you keep doing it. As for the trying to serious part, I was being serious, as I find that humorous responses with a touch of sarcasm the hardest hitting, most efficient, and memorable way to get a point across. Abe was famous for his story telling with a punch. Anyway lets look at my responses.
Ted Re,..Here's what's so off about Harris's statement......its not the hate of Bush that has liberals so bent out of shape.
That I would agree with. It is all of those damn contortions that are the problem. <<
Personally, I thought that was a good intelligent answer, right to the point, and difficult to response to and puts the accuser on the defensive. What contortions you say. How many contortions are you going through right now trying to answer Steves question. How about your explanation about why Bosnia was the right thing to do, and Iraq isn't. Man, you are twisting the truth so hard, its painful just to listen. And your defense of the Palestinians includes justifying their tactics of bombing little children, man no game of twister could get you more convoluted that that answer. Simply put, are you against killing little children or not, because if you are, quit trying to justify it.
I am surprised. I thought you hated all of them equally.
Another snide remark, but effective. Did you notice how the word hate, put you on the defensive immediately. How odd, a liberal who professes to love everybody, hates Gw. Another contortion? And when you say his policies, since he was in office; not so, you hated him well before that. Don't believe me, ask the other guys here. What do you say David, JIm, Al, Steve, RobS. Is Teds putrifying hate anymore intense now than before GW took office?
believe his vision is so different than that of most liberals that it proves to be extremely threatening and provides a flashpoint from which a vehement reaction can be expected from liberals.
Boy, what can I say here, except, you need help. You really need to take some deep breaths, and settle down before you send crap like this. Now you are telling me that GW is responsible for all of the liberals reactions, that you are incapable of controlling your rage, because GW made you do it. And you liberals have the nerve to wonder why most people have distanced themselves from your position. Its a position, in your own words, of rage coming fromn your hated of GW,not logic, or compassion, thats why. And if Gw turns you into raging monsters, we can only be thankfull, that people who can't control their emotions, aren't in control of the country with their finger on the button, when Kim IL, or Saddam rile you up..
......let's see if we can do some housecleaning in 2004, starting with the head shrub.
Yes, I can see you and your attitude will do well.
Yes, I may be an idiot or an anal retentive conservative, but what the heck, at least I can control my emotions. Now which do you think the people would rather have running the country, a anal retentive conservative, or a bunch of raging liberals with their fingers on the button. |
