Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (27004)	1/7/2003 6:17:29 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

<What is so funny is that they claimed the printing of money is what caused the share prices to go up excessively. Well, are those who make that claim so clueless that they can't see that their theory is falsified by the fact that he's been printing like crazy, issuing credit flat out, but share prices have tumbled from early 2000, through all of 2000, 2001 and 2002. > No not at all... this is 100% incorrect and once again demonstrates your complete misunderstanding of basic economics. Please follow along with these mainstream economists for a clue: morganstanley.com northerntrust.com grantspub.com pimco.com I won't even mention the 'bear rags' or the Austrian school guys who have predicted all this way ahead: <<All good fun and profits for those who guess right.>> Exactly. Why you can't seem to step out of your one variable world into reality is beyond me... but hey, it works for you! And the rant you can create around the chosen paradigm! Wow, talk about self reinforcing, positive feedback loop system! DAK