Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (339212)	1/7/2003 11:41:48 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Do you consider Korea to be a satellite nation?

To: Neocon who wrote (339212)	1/7/2003 12:07:26 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I have no idea why your opinion is that Iraq is an enemy. Do you have an idea why my opinion is Iraq is a threat. A clear and present danger. Were my statements to obtuse. Did you know in hosts table, the name of the IP of my gateway to the internet is obtuse? I wonder does gateway obtuse selectively filter all the reasons you opine Iraq is an enemy. Or is it you never stated them. In World War II, The people of germany and japan were unified in the belief that they should rob kill and take whatever. I would call germany and japan are enemies in World War II as the people were unified with the threat. So is that why you call Iraq out enemy. I call Iraq a threat, a clear and present danger. But Iraq falls far short of being called an enemy. The problem with you academic whatever is I think your words can easily be used justify Moslem group association of your message. If that is you intent, that is up to you. Muslims and Arabs are a clear and present danger. I believe my semantics of approach are not ambiguous.