SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (11181)1/7/2003 5:44:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Taylor On US Markets & Gold

Overvaluation of Equities Continues

Believing in fairy tales, Americans have kept stock prices from adjusting to reality. To be sure, if the deflationary path outlined above pans out, they will be forced to understand that the tooth fairy did not put the money under the pillow. At the end of this week the S&P 500 P/E ratio stood at 26.87. Historically ratios above 20 were considered high. A P/E ratio of 15 was considered fair value and when the P/E ratio gets to 10 or under, the equity markets have been undervalued.

(Editor's Note: The following chart shows the S&P 500 would necessarily have to drop 59% to 490 to reflect a fair value P/E of 15)

gold-eagle.com

If we could make the case for vigorous economic growth in 2003, we would be less apprehensive about current stock valuations. However, with pricing power still on the decline, with personal and corporate balances sheets still a disaster and with no end in sight for excess supplies of goods and services we find it hard to be optimistic, no matter how much money Greenspan pumps into the system. If there profits continue to decline, why would capital spending rise? And why would companies not fire workers rather than hire them? And with job losses mounting, why would the housing bubble not implode? And with housing and car markets bubbling in excess thanks to all manner of intervention via printing press money, gold manipulations and perhaps direct equity intervention, why would we expect those major industries to come back any time soon, even if the economy and equity markets in fact did finally hit bottom?

Bullish Markets: Gold, Silver, Gold Stocks & Commodities. The spot price of all four markets is powerfully above rising longer and shorter term moving averages and major resistance levels have been broken through.

For gold, the next major area of resistance is likely to be in the $375 to $400 range. Silver needs to take out $5.00 and then $5.50. The XAU closed the week at 79.51. If it can get through the highs in the 90's of this past spring, gold stocks should be "off to the races."

The U.S. Treasury markets are still technically bullish, but with gold on the rise, and with rates off their lows, most economists are predicting that the bond market may have seen its highs (lows for interest rates). I'm not so sure about that because as long as bad days for equities are good days for bonds. We say that because we think stock have much further to fall. So as long as stock fall without a major plunge in the dollar index, we could continue to see bonds rise still further. Indeed, that is how the Fed no doubts hopes to keep the outrageously overvalued housing market alive. They will go out into the market and buy long Term government debt if need be to drive down long-term rates.

At some point, that policy will fail. We suspect it will be when foreigners finally do lose confidence in the dollar and America. At that time, we expect to see a plunging stock market and a plunging bond market even though the economy will also be heading lower. Normally a weak economy bolsters the bond market but two factors could shake the very foundations of confidence in the dollar and the American economy. Those two factors are: 1) Flight of foreign capital from the U.S. and 2) Massive insolvencies in Corporate, personal and local government debt markets. So what we really want to keep an eye on is that point in time when bad news in the stock market is no longer good news for the bond markets. What that day arrives, we expect to see a massive dive in the bond markets, the dollar market and the equity markets. Conversely, bullish markets should be gold and some of the stronger foreign currency markets.

If the bond market starts crapping at the same time stock pries decline, then we might look for a very rapid decline in the dollar and an approach to James Sinclair's targeted decline of the buck toward the mid 70's on the Dollar Index. At the same time, we would expect gold to take out the resistance levels noted above, the first of which is the $375 to $400 range. So the Treasury markets, which are astoundingly large, should hold a key to the direction of many key markets in the days ahead. A flight out of the dollar and out of the Treasury markets at the same time is the bad omen we must keep watch for.

Bearish Markets: Stocks remain substantially below their declining 200 day moving averages, but above their shorter declining averages. A break below key support levels could trigger a test of the October lows. If those lows are broken, I think we may start to see the beginning of a capitulation phase that is always necessary in order for bear markets to end. A rise above the downtrends could buy more time for stocks, but with the primary direction of the market down, the bear market would not be over.

The other major bearish market of concern is the US dollar. At 102.47, The dollar has fallen decidedly below its uptrend support lines. The next support level is around 90. After that it falls to around 80 and after that to the mid 70's which is where James Sinclair says the dollar may be headed before some sort of gold linking will be required to keep the dollar from heading for zero.

**********

GOLD

With its close at $350.90 on Friday in New York, gold is looking very, very bullish. I thought its performance on January 2nd when the market posted a gain of over 200 points was especially encouraging.

What is my target for gold in 2003? Lets start by looking at the market fundamentals. As noted by Frank Veneroso in his excellent work back in 1998, based strictly the yellow metals supply and demand fundamentals, it should have traded at $600. To get to this price level, no exceptional fear or panic from paper would be required. The only requirement would be for governments to stop dishording, by way of outright sales and gold leasing programs. Based on supply and demand fundamentals as well as short term and long-term elasticity of supply and demand that was the equilibrium price Mr. Veneroso came up with. He proved with little doubt that the amount of gold being dishorded was severely understated by Goldfields, the World Gold Council and others like the CPM group. For an update of Mr. Veneroso's work, the reader is invited to click on to the following link: gata.org.

BLANCHARD SUES J.P. MORGAN CHASE & BARRICK

The following notice was sent out to the clients of Blanchard and Company, the largest gold bullion coin dealer in America:

On December 18, 2002, Blanchard and Company, Inc. filed an antitrust lawsuit against Barrick Gold Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and other, as yet unnamed, bullion banks, accusing them of unlawfully combining to manipulate the price of gold at the expense of Blanchard's clients. Blanchard is paying the costs of the suit.

Barrick has made over $2 billion from its short sales of gold, inherently high-risk speculations that have been profitable in every one of the last 59 quarters. The same type of accounting maze that hid Enron's debts has made it possible for Barrick to manipulate the price of gold without the checks and balances that come from public scrutiny.

January 7, 2003

Jay Taylor, Editor of J Taylor's Gold & Technology Stocks

miningstocks.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (11181)1/7/2003 5:58:26 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Dirt Poor

_________________________________________________________

By Rodney Cook
January 6, 2003

Greenspan, the closet gold bug, appears to be coming out

Since my last writing, events have continued to trend along the lines of highest probability. The
secondary trend reversal confirmed precisely as forecast. Short positions in the general share market were well advised, and have provided nice profits.

Fortuitously, the recommended entry position in gold shares for 11/19, namely Harmony, Gold Fields, Gold Corp, and Agnico-Eagle, caught the secondary trend just right and are up 15%, 24%, 25%, and 26% respectively. I love it when a plan comes together.

I continue to hold positions in the following precious metals shares: Thistle Mining, Miramar Mining, Carnac Resources, First Silver Reserve, Starfield Resources, Novagold Resources, Caledonia Mining, Golden Star Resources, Durban Deep, Rangold, Harmony, Gold Corp, Glamis Gold, Agnico Eagle, Meridian Gold, Pan American Silver, Silver Standard Resources, and Apex Silver. Most are up dramatically, some obscenely.

So what? It is unlikely that this torrid pace will continue for the coming year, but it might. Most likely there will be something of a pull back in gold and its shares. Maybe even, as we have covered before, a false dawn for the general economy. The greater the pull back, the greater the opportunity.

Fed Watch

Last article, we posited that Fed watchers, while alarmed, were less alarmed that circumstances dictated. This was confirmed by Greenspan's recent speech to the Economic Club of New York, with its considerable reference to gold's role in the monetary system. Essentially, Greenspan said that gold may be necessary to protect the value of the dollar, because central bankers can't control deflation.

Most intriguing are the bread crumbs that lead to this speech.

None Dare Call It Reason

The Internet offers access to a richness of ideas never before available. It is possible to wander through and gather a tremendous volume of information and opinions on most any topic. A few years ago I began researching gold. One particularly interesting thread of discussion and speculation was promulgated by a bunch of whack job conspiracy theorists that decry the Fed and the Treasury for selling out the nation's gold. On the surface, most any sane man would dismiss this story completely. I nearly did. But it is my job to rake through the detritus of human ideas to find the one or two overlooked gems that can lead to fabulous riches. I have come to the well considered conclusion, as did many hedge funds about a year ago, that this time the whack jobs are mostly right.

If they are completely right, there has been treason at the highest levels. However, I never believe a conspiracy theory where a failure of reason offers an alternative explanation. That's almost always.

The true story will likely never be known. Even if known, it will defy common explanation and will be discussed for many decades. The villains will remain in shadows and not be defeated by man but by the cycles of inflation and deflation. A natural force more powerful than nations or armies.

I have my own theories. Many are most certainly wrong, but drawing from the web and connecting the dots, a story can be told.

As Promised, A Scary Campfire Story

The story begins with Barrick Gold. And a strategy for growth. Very simply, Barrick would take advantage of a bear market in gold to acquire other properties at distress prices. Nice friendly Banksters were able to offer considerable assistance. Through the alchemy of derivatives, hedging, and forward sales the Banksters were able to offer Barrick quite a deal: no downside risk in the event that gold were to rise.

What's this. No risk? No such beast. Someone was taking the risk. With Big Daddy Bush on the Board, the operations and policies of the Exchange Stabilization Fund could be telegraphed to Barrick. Essentially, Barrick and the Banksters could front run the Treasury. After all, bond traders do it all the time. An honored tradition. Over the years Barrick grew to be the world's premier gold miner, with a hedge fund bolted to the side. A hedge fund with an edge.

As the years went by, a second administration found a use for this edge. Any one remember Clinton's temper tantrums over not being able to control long rates? Well, Larry Summers to the rescue. His understanding of Gibson's paradox set the stage for a manipulation of biblical proportions: By suppressing the price of gold, you can suppress long term interest rates. Eureka! The bond ghouls were defeated. Clinton and Rubin and the politicos of the day could inflate stocks and bonds forever. Or at least until someone else takes office.

Thus began a new period in economic history. A period where the Exchange Stabilization Fund facilitated the long peg on a bewildering array of gold swaps, gold leases, forward sales and unfathomable derivatives schemes. Spreading beyond Barrick, the entire industry has become caught up is a web of structured finance that could only be created during a financial mania, and can only be unwound during a deflation. The Treasury has recharacterized its gold reserves more than once. Only the naive believe that the type of fraud demonstrated by our corporate elites has not infiltrated the federal monetary system. The insanity began when the historic relationship between stock and bond prices was violated in 1996. Sobriety will return when historic reality returns to this primal relationship.

One by one, the party go-ers are sobering up. Austrian concepts are being considered. Mr. Market has been discounting hedged mining companies. 'Sir' Alan has been emphatic about netting legislation before Congress. The Federal Reserve discussed buying gold mines after 9/ 11. The Russians have circulated the gold Ruble, the Chinese have liberalized the gold market, and the Islamic Dinar is about to launch. Lawsuits have been filed, first by altruists, now by commercial interests. Dollar devaluation was the concensus at Jackson Hole this year. Kensian ideas are being dissed by Fed governors. Monetization of debt has become policy. Dollar devaluation was the concensus at Jackson Hole this year. Gold and its shares are breaking out.

And Greenspan, the closet gold bug, appears to be coming out.

Shut Her Down Newt, She's Sucking Sand.

Clearly, the Fed has been laying the groundwork to deal with a systemic monetary or currency crises for at least a year. While many do not give them credit, they clearly understand the problem at hand. After all, they have been party to the problem.

So, the Fed has panicked, and adopted essentially the monetarist economic philosophy of Milton Friedman by accepting blame for the last depression. The Keynesians are all a tither, having lost their perceived exclusivity over policy formulation.

The tiny minority of Austrian economists just sit back and smile. Those who follow their advice are currently counting their coin.

What is the Fed to do? At this point, they should build their gold reserves. If they are hypothecated with some mysterious instrument of structured finance, the positions should be unwound. If the gold is gone, lay plans for confiscation.

All appear to be in the works.

Personal Central Banking

So what's a simple debt slave to do? My conclusion is that you must become your own central banker, and front run our monetary authorities. Sound complicated? Not really.

Unwind your structured finance position. Buy nothing on margin or with debt. Pay off your mortgage, lest you find yourself upside down as this debt may survive foreclosure. If, like nearly all of us, you prefer not to rent and can't pay off the mortgage then off-set this debt with a small amount of gold bullion. Effectively a position in condensed real estate. Dirt. Should deflation hammer the price of your home, the coincident currency crises should buoy gold sufficiently to pay off the debt. In a localized hyper inflationary environment gold would serve the same purpose: We've all heard the story of the dirt poor German bus boy who bought his employer's hotel with a single double eagle received just months previously. Gold bullion can serve well as mortgage insurance for us debt slaves. Maybe even offer financial freedom.

So build your gold reserves. Central banks are becoming net buyers of physical gold. If you are sufficiently wealthy, take delivery of a COMEX contract or two. Or three. The entertainment value as you watch your borker's reaction should be worth the price alone. If you are less affluent, buy a few coins. A nice mix of bullion coins, old world gold coins, some silver dollars, and 90% silver junk can be accumulated on price pull backs, of which I expect many during the coming year.

A pull back in the gold price appears imminent and may offer immediate opportunity. The commercial short position is obscene. I thought that yesterday's spike down in gold price might be the beginning of an aggressive push to get the price down to levels where this position can be covered with less pain. But it is possible that the commercials are trapped. That the short position can't be covered, and that it will ultimately be "netted out" in a mysterious closed door process that leaves the major commercial producers owned by the central bankers, and the treasury's coffers of "deep storage gold" filled to the brim: The confiscation this time will most likely be of the hedged producers and naïve explorers.

So buy a little now, and watch for a near term pull back to buy more. Pile on if the commercial shorts start to cover and fuel a break-out over 350-360 as future pull-backs will likely take place from much higher levels. Panic buying in China, Japan, Russia, and the Middle East could break the backs of the commercials, set a new price level, and block the path to the form of confiscation perpetrated by Roosevelt in 1933. Barring a false dawn scenario, by year's end, $350 gold could look very cheap.

And with a little coin in your pocket you may begin to see that, just perhaps, gold is not priced in dollars but that dollars are priced in gold.

And you will understand central banking.

Rodney C. Cook, Ph.D.
aka The BigFisherman
January 6, 2003
www.obsceneprophets.com

CTO & Founder
Sightward, Inc.
425-688-9921 x1029
rod@sightward.com

"Power from Prediction"

This information is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

321gold Inc Miami USA
321gold.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (11181)1/7/2003 7:02:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
How Might Terrorism Affect The Stock Market?

by James Dines, editor
The Dines Letter

How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing! Neville Chamberlain, Prime Minister of England, Sept. 27, 1938 (just before World War II)

King Dionysius was the fourth-century BC tyrant of Syracuse, the richest city in Sicily. Swathed in luxuries, in a spectacular palace, with rich clothing and jewelry, rare perfumes and spices and the best foods, he was nonetheless so insecure that he surrounded himself with court flatterers (adsentatores) to buoy his ego. Damocles was the court sycophant, constantly praising King Dionysius, and declaring how lucky and blessed he was. Once, the king offered to trade places with Damocles for a day, readily accepted by Damocles, who suddenly had all the riches and luxuries money could buy at the time. But Damocles inadvertently lifted his eyes toward the ceiling and saw a razor-sharp sword whose point almost touched his head and he stiffened, ashen faced, with trembling hands. Upon realizing that it was hanging by a single horsehair, pointed right between his eyes, he froze in place for fear that any sudden move could kill him. After Dionysius inquired why he had lost his appetite, Damocles asked if Dionysius saw the sword. Dionysius replied that of course he saw it, and that it was always hanging over his own head those who wish to be a leader must be willing to accept risks. Damocles, realizing that he had been mistaken, rejected riches and fame, and was glad to go back to his own humble home.
Asked what the most important factor was in future stock market action, one television respondent last week concluded that it was "future earnings." Well, fair enough, isn't that always the most important factor?
No. Amateurs know the rules, but seasoned professionals know the exceptions. Whatever earnings are to be, a terrorist Sword of Damocles hangs over every investor, whereby a single unanticipated terrorist event might take the bottom out of the stock market.
How many of you noticed that American negotiators didn't ask whether or not North Korea had a nuclear program? The press reported that, "We presented the evidence and they admitted it." In other words, Bush had known, as a fact, for some time, that North Korea had been playing with nukes. This set us back reflecting on Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech recently, fingering Iran, Iraq and North Korea. It seems fair to assume that Bush has hard evidence on all three, does it not? Then we thought back to 9/ 11, when the Taliban vociferously denied involvement while Bush spoke right past them, preparing for an invasion of Afghanistan, not arguing, not negotiating that is Bush's style. Accordingly, we cannot resist inferring that he has something really big on Saddam, providing sufficient cause for an invasion, but he is too much the tight-lipped Texas sheriff of the Jimmy Stewart school to be interested in offering lengthy proof, so we can only guess what it might be. or order online at www.dinesletter.com.

Considering the very urgency to attack Iraq, we suspect that Bush has gotten wind of Saddam slipping a weapon of mass destruction to terrorists to be used on us. Not merely ordinary explosives, obtainable locally, but probably a nuclear device, or a bacteriological weapon that would make an area uninhabitable for many, many years.
To be used where? Considering the recent explosions in Bali's idyllic Kuta Beach, and Moscow's theater, we cannot believe anywhere would be spared. Projecting this line of thinking further, what type of terrorism? Having plotted for over a year, chances are it would be spectacular, whatever it is to be: simultaneous explosions of numerous bridges and tunnels with vehicular bombs, a group of snipers spread out nationally, or a suitcase nuke. Where? In the U.S., New York and Washington DC must be high on their priority list, but the FBI has recently captured al-Qaeda photographs of American railroads. Not everybody has yet fully grasped that we are in a world war, 21st century style, the early stages of it.
In our last The Dines Letter (TDL 18 Oct. 02) we wrote "Avoid crowds, especially after nightfall," and only five days later a Moscow theater was invaded by Chechens, part of an 8-year old struggle with Russia, and suddenly the lives of over eight-hundred innocents were under mortal threat. After the death of at least 119 hostages, the Russian military bombed Chechnya in revenge, but it resulted in a military helicopter getting shot down, killing nine soldiers (a half-dozen aircraft have been shot down by Chechen rockets in the last three months). As with Israel, we believe that neither side can win by force, yet President Putin is undoubtedly tempted to employ the bush doctrine of "pre- emptive strike" into Russia's Georgia, as India might likewise attack Pakistan over Kashmir. This is a dangerous time, involving fundamental geopolitical changes in the world order, and Russia should at least be grateful that the Chechen target was not a nuclear reactor. So don't for a minute think targets are limited to faraway places. Where next in America?
Our gaze turns toward Alaska, which supplies 17% of America's domestically produced oil. The 800-mile Trans-Alaska Pipeline was recently shut down for two days after a drunk fired one bullet into it; it is indefensible, especially in remote areas. The Alaska Coast Guard has only 2,000 people guarding around half of America's entire coastline area, and our TDLrs in that state are advised to remain realistically alert.
Coming attacks will be "unbelievable." The World Trade Center, as with the purportedly "unsinkable" Titanic before it sank, was specifically built to withstand a crash by the largest airplane of its time a 707 but even then the fuel load was not considered in the original design. Terrorists might rent apartments in high-rise buildings, bringing in explosives. Cargo on passenger planes is virtually unchecked, although the nitwits in charge are still confiscating nail clippers from passengers. Big-rig trucks handling explosive fuel or toxic chemicals are ideal terrorist weapons. We have all just observed how one rifle and two sociopaths paralyzed the capital of the world's superpower what asymmetrical leverage! The one certainty we have is that the Taliban was watching the huge economic and terror impact of the two snipers, a point we made in one of the Interim Warning Bulletins we sent since our last TDL. And on 6 Nov 02, Hong Kong police arrested four al-Qaeda men seeking to trade 600 kgs of heroin and five tonnes of hashish for Stinger anti-aircraft missiles from undercover U.S. FBI agents, that could be fired at commercial aircraft from a building near any airport in the world.
Stirrings of trouble are everywhere. In August, six in a "sleeper cell" were arrested in Seattle, Washington, and it was discovered that they had been surveilling Disneyland, the MGM Grand hotel in Las Vegas, and plotting to detonate a dirty nuclear device in the U.S. Four men this August were busted near Dearborn, Michigan, another sleeper cell. There are almost daily reports of arrests of phony asylum-seekers, especially into Germany, and we would not be surprised to see American airplane pilots packing heat soon America banned pilots from carrying guns in July 2001, amazing timing. But as airplanes as targets become "hardened," terrorists will simply hit elsewhere in a world that we have often described as a "terrorist's candy store." The U.S. State Department has identified at least 70,000 suspected terrorists in the world, many repeatedly having tried to enter the U.S. to form sleeper cells for attacks someday, and undoubtedly some have already slipped in.
For example, al-Qaeda is definitely on the attack in Afghanistan. In July an assassin killed an Afghan vice-president in Kabul, and almost killed Karzai himself which would have been a devastating blow in the war against terrorism on the same day that a car bomb in Kabul killed 30 people and wounded nearly 170. Recently, a booby-trapped fuel truck loaded with explosives headed for the Bagram Air Base north of Kabul, whose vital function is to support ground troops hunting for al-Qaeda, but was intercepted by police. The assassination of an American diplomat in Jordan at the end of October shows that international borders mean little in this new war, and it is definitely not over yet. An Afghan army is being trained by American, French and British soldiers, but it will not be fielded until June 2004.
The explosion in Bali amongst light-hearted, innocent, unsuspecting youngsters was a warning that al-Qaeda seeks economic warfare. Granted, there was a religious component in that Bali is a Hindu enclave in a Muslim country, but all Asian tourism will crash, and it was almost as efficacious a weapon as a nuke. Tourists might begin avoiding all Muslim countries, fulfilling what must be a master plan to destabilize them cheaply. The Bali explosion will also damage investment flows for hundreds of millions of people, and terrorists' strategic master plan is still to unify Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and the southern Philippines into one huge Islamic caliphate under a type of 14th- century rule. Singapore is especially vulnerable to a deep recession. We have not seen Bangladesh mentioned anywhere in the press, but now we are first to predict that it will be an important source of terrorism also. All TDLrs are advised to avoid travel in Southeast Asian, especially Phuket in Thailand. For years we have been warning about "The Coming End of The Age of Travel"; like it or not, international travel is ending and will be as kaput as it was during World War II.
We have an American president who mispronounces nuclear as "nookyouler" and terrorists as "terrist," but he knows for sure he wants to take Saddam out. Bush invading Iraq would, our best guess, prompt Saddam to immediately hit Israel (with bombs, nukes, poison chemicals or biodisease) such that their inevitable retaliation would inflame much of the Arab world. Bush needs to settle the Mideast conflict as a key unblocking move, a point to which we will return.
This is a 21st-century war, brand new, with few borders, an example of which is the new escalation in Yemen. Instead of capturing and interrogating a suspect, there was a simple assassination by a CIA-run Predator drone aircraft, armed with Hellfire anti-tank missiles, vaporizing top al-Qaeda Abu Ali into an oily smudge in the Yemen desert revenge for the bombing of the USS Cole. America had criticized such "targeted killings" by Israel, so is this hypocrisy? If "the whole world is a battlefield," could our flying robots kill anyone, anywhere? And if we use robots why can't they be used against us? Will this inflame the "Arab street"? And what about the geopolitical rumblings in the entire Middle East because of a possible American attack on Iraq? We will cover geopolitics more in our upcoming Annual Forecast Issue, but Iran hates Iraq, having lost 20,000 troops to Saddam's chemical weapons, and its youth want a rapprochement with the U.S., in our opinion, believe it or not. We hereby predict that Iran will amaze the world by accepting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, and maybe even curb its development of nuclear weapons. Iran's rapprochement might partially be prompted by fears of the thrust of U.S. power into Iraq right next door, plus they want to be in on a division of Iraqi spoils.
We are proud to have been apprising our TDLrs of "The Coming Terrorism" for over a decade, when we were alone and "looked wrong." We hope to continue to provide world-class analysis and informational coverage in the future. That also applies to the Middle East, where we remain strictly neutral and limit ourselves to trying to gauge the impact of events there on stock markets. Our two basic hypotheses there have long been that neither side could win by force, and that both the Israeli and Palestinian populations are deeply divided. We have often forecasted that the political division in Israel would tear apart Ariel Sharon's government, and the mitosis has just happened, with a new election scheduled for January. The secular Labor Party is willing to trade land for peace, while the religious Likud is not and the vote between so-called "doves and hawks" will determine whether or not more violence is coming the area, yet another factor we find ourselves including in our agonizing struggle to determine what 2003 might look like. The following condensed and carefully selected excerpts save our TDLrs valuable time.
In conclusion, trying to talk sense into some people would be like imprinting metal coins with "Get a Life!" on them, and burying them in the world's beaches!
Even before the bombing in Bali, Southeast Asia had already earned a reputation as a hotbed of terrorism. Over the past year, bombs have exploded at bus stations, street markets and church services in the Philippines, and across Indonesia on the islands of Java, Sulawesi and Ambon. The governments of Malaysia and Singapore claim to have uncovered terrorist cells planning big attacks. America considered Abu Sayyaf, an Islamic militant group in the southern Philippines, threatening enough to send troops to help fight it. Investigators discovered that senior al-Qaeda figures, not to mention some of the September 11th hijackers, had spent time in the region. Southeast Asian governments have been floundering in the face of these threats. Malaysia and Singapore keep arresting more suspected terrorists, an indication that their networks have spread more widely than the authorities at first imagined. Economist (England), 19 Oct 02
An unusually powerful electronic attack on Monday briefly crippled 9 of the 13 computer servers that manage global Internet traffic. The FBI and White House described the attack as the largest and most sophisticated assault on the servers in the history of the Internet. The origin of the attack was not known. Associated Press, 23 Oct 02

Editor's Note: James Dines, is editor of The Dines Letter, P.O. Box 22, Belvedere, CA 94920, 1 year, 17 issues, $195. Each issue of The Dines Letter is packed with Mr. Dines' crucial insights on what will happen with stocks, bonds and gold. Specific "Buy" and "Sell" signals and Mr. Dines' spectacularly accurate forecasting charts. Subscribe today and receive a FREE Report, 10 Gold Stocks That Could Make You Rich. This special report describes 10 gold and silver stock superstars, each handpicked by Mr. Dines who believes they could yield 10-fold profits in 12 months. Mr. Dines is also offering Bull & Bear readers a special 3-issue trial for $59. Call 1-800-845-8259 today.

thebullandbear.com