Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : P&S and STO Death Blow's -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (22841)	1/8/2003 1:47:07 PM
From: h8_2_b_l8	Respond to of 30712

I think you're looking at if from Commercial + Large + Small = 0, while I'm looking at it from an independent large trader point of view where large trader long positions plus long trader short positions = 0 Even though commercials always play inverse to small and large traders to create a liquid market, it seems as if large trader positions dictate market direction. If you think about it from the point of view of the big players large trader net 0 and commercial trader net short is the closest to sync these two can come before the rest of the market takes notice. Large traders are net 0. Market moves down they cover short trades while adding to long trades. Good profit. Commercials are net short. Market moves down they cover huge net short position. Great profit. Small investors. Screwed. Transfer of wealth.