SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ThirdEye who wrote (340183)1/8/2003 12:37:47 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Crawford's widely recognized as an uninformed anti-semitic nutcase, Third Eye. I don't know why you bother with him.



To: ThirdEye who wrote (340183)1/8/2003 8:38:15 PM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
>> In case you haven't noticed, one of the world issues of the moment is whether or not we are at war with Islam <<

that's because the powerful jews who run the media want the united states to engage in a war against islam. it's in their best interest to stir up a clash of civilizations.

>> Regardless or who owns any media, those comments by Falwell and Graham would have been picked up and highlighted in a major way because they were so inflammatory to about 25% of the world's population <<

prominent jews have made statements just as inflammatory, but it's not in the interests of the zionist jews who run the media to highlight those statements. it definitely serves their purpose for the falwells and grahams of the world to incite mulsim resentment.

>> Besides, you also fail to notice that Falwell and Graham's support for Israel is not so much political as it is religious, being tied up with their whole apocalyptic vision thing. <<

how do you know why people like falwell and graham are so avidly pro-israel? jerry falwell can't come on tv and say what he really thinks about jews anymore than anyone else. he has to justify his views in a very politically correct way if he wants to remain relevant. and believe me he does.

>> So you miss the mark on two counts....so far. <<

it only appears that way to you because you are ignorant as to the extent of jewish-control of the media and culture and how this power is used to silence any critic of israel or jews. if you were fully aware of how much pressure is brought to bear against any critic of israel or jews, you would likely understand where my point of view comes from.

>> Now, as for so-called Jewish control of the media, you have totally ignored the fact that all the major media are in the hands of conservative corporate entities <<

regardless of whether or not a corporation is publicly held or not, someone has to run it. someone has to make the decisions. someone has to staff all the positions. someone has to bring the content to air. someone has to deliver that content.

>> To imagine that a small coterie of jews somehow manages to control the news coming from all these entities and to persist in your robotic racist rants against all evidence to the contrary only displays your own demented ignorance. <<

well why don't you have the courage to debate me instead of dismissing my claim. let's talk about who produces the shows you watch. let's talk about just who owns, controls, and manages these corporate entities. do you feel up to the challenge? or is it just easier to dismiss me as some kind of ranting racist?

put your money where your mouth is...



To: ThirdEye who wrote (340183)1/8/2003 11:01:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
How do you explain a "conservative" corporate entity like Knight-Ridder owning a string of newspapers with ultra left wing editorial pages?