Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (157624)	1/8/2003 1:22:09 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1584252

Ted, <Its not as simplistic as that.......Clinton was ready to get heavy handed with NK. However, at the last minute, Carter asked Clinton to let him try to negotiate a treaty with NK.> Actually, I had known all that, but I wanted to be brief. ;-) Like I said before, I didn't think the 1994 treaty was a good idea in the first place. Clinton probably didn't think so, either, which may be why America was deadbeat on its obligations. (Or more likely it could be because of other complications, like the North Korean spy sub that ran aground on South Korean shores back in 1996.) I remembered after I posted why Clinton didn't like the deal.......we were supposed to give NK two more nuclear reactors. However, Clinton kept stalling and that pissed off NK......that's why they began to screw around in 1998. To date, we have not handed over the two reactors. ted