Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (213136)	1/8/2003 2:35:22 PM
From: Mike M2	Respond to of 436258

Wayne, well said. mike

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (213136)	1/8/2003 3:21:44 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

Wayne, We disagree on Bush's motives, and I do think that Clinton did more good for America than any Republican has ever done. But he was definitely sneaky on the economic side. Fortunately, he had that pristine personal life to give him credibility. <VBG>

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (213136)	1/8/2003 4:59:05 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Bush, being a stupid moron could be harder to predict IMO (on the surface). Who know what an idiot will do? But.... Bush can be bought. Big time. And he still wants to win the Cold War. So... The big clue is who bush listens to: Big Oil The Banks Credit Card Companies etc etc etc Anyone rich enough to line his coffers War Mongers like Rumsfeld So in a way you can bet Bush will be stupid enough to trust the morons he associates with. Now, let's consider clinton. We all know Clinton is a liar, but I do not think he can be bought. He is too smart for that, yet not smart enough to tell the truth sometimes. So.... Does this make him easier or harder to figure out. But being tons smarter than Bush (can there really be any debate in this), figure Clinton to do either the right thing(or at least what he really perceives as being right) or what is in Clinton's best interest. This is much harder to figure out than trying to figure out who owns Bush. Therefore, protecting ones back from Clinton could be harder than Bush. Too many variables. Follow the cash and you know where Bush is. Clinton might just take the cash and do what he wants with it. M