Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (157690)	1/9/2003 2:43:51 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579788

BTW, after the Lott debacle, why are the conservatives pushing for Pickering? Never mind...Pickering is good for the Democrats. Al

To: tejek who wrote (157690)	1/9/2003 4:18:48 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1579788

now.org The first part is just about his politics. The fact that he is a conservative doesn't make him either unqualified or a racist. As to the other statements in your link - Of particular concern to Democratic senators are Pickering's ties to Mississippi's Sovereignty Commission, a state-funded agency established after Brown v. Board of Education to oppose integration efforts. Probing Pickering's relationship to this group, Feinstein asked Pickering about his decision — while serving in the Mississippi state senate — to twice vote to fund this group, which monitored civil rights leaders in the 1960s and 1970s. Pickering alleged that at the time of the vote, he did not realize the Commission was still functional, then stated he would not have voted the same way today. This is the best argument against Pickering in the whole article but its still week. All sorts of groups are funded by state or federal governments often as part of a bill so big and containing so many things that the people doing the voting don't know what they are voting for. Shedding more light on the nominee's past, Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) questioned Pickering about the statements he made when he switched to the Republican party in 1964, the year African-Americans intensified their efforts to get the vote in Mississippi and other states across the South. At the time, Pickering allegedly stated that Mississippi "had been heaped upon with humiliation" by the national Democratic party's support of many civil rights initiatives and that the "Republican party was the only hope for rescuing Mississippi from socialism." A Democrat might also say that the Democratic party was heaping on humilation on the Republicans at the time if it was embarasing the Republican party for not supporting civil rights legislation back then. There isn't enough here to amount to support for the idea that Pikering is racist. Certainly avoiding socialism is a good reason to not support the Democratic party. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) broached the issue of Pickering's role as judge in the 1994 trial of a man accused, along with two others, of burning an 8-foot cross on the lawn of an interracial couple. Pickering also faced questions about the trial from John Edwards (D-N.C.), who said that Pickering had offered to grant a new trial, on his own motion. Pickering first denied the allegations, then stated he had "no recollection of having said that." When Durbin asked why Pickering had gone to such great lengths to assist the defendant, Pickering replied that he was concerned about the unfair disparity in sentencing. (The other two defendants, who pleaded guilty, received less severe sentences.) If you start with the assumption that Pickering is a racist then in your mind this might bolster the case for that idea but without starting with that assumption this amounts to nothing. Making an effort to make sure that a particular person, who happens to be a racist, gets a fair trial is not evidence that you are a racist. If it was you would have to call the ACLU racist. In answer to a question posed by Durbin, Pickering attempted to justify calling his former law partner — a self-described firm believer in segregation... So calling a racist on the phone is evidence that you are a racist?!? Tim