SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBTFD who wrote (341022)1/9/2003 5:19:51 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I will admit no such thing. You are taking my words out of context, but that's OK. I forgive you.

You obviously don't wish to discuss the pro's and con's of taxation on the working their ass off portion of the population of the United States of America.

I, along with a good portion of the population understand where you are coming from. It has become quite obvious (research 11/05/2002) to the vast majority of citizens that libs/dems use the economy, hate and race as a tool to divide us all aka gain power have their way ect......

;) M



To: JBTFD who wrote (341022)1/9/2003 5:32:45 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Message 18423609

To:Mark Anderson who wrote (340822)
From: moenmac

Thursday, Jan 9, 2003  2:54 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 341043
So in your world Mark, those of us who are successful that literally fall down exhausted after a hard days work should just give it to those who aren't willing to work their asses off?

(I am NOT talking about the truly needy such as the disabled)

M

I see nothing in this remark to cause you to assume that M believes that poor people are lazy bums. Actually she is stating the more likely idea that lazy people are likely to be poor. Then she even goes out of her way to make sure the needy are not included in the lazy. You could apologize, it is not such a big thing.



To: JBTFD who wrote (341022)1/10/2003 2:58:53 PM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 769670
 
Thomas is so right.....

Only the stupidly inclined could interpret what I said the way you did.

LOL

Finding fantasy in well phrased queries is proof that some of us have greater imaginations than others. Perhaps you should be a screen writer for the folks in Gollywood?

But back to the argument Mark:

Where is it found...as you state in your post #341135..... that 50% of America has much of nothing. Where you lied about my responding to your original post.

Why is it that you give all liberals a bad name and that many liberals are actors living in a world of lies and deception?

Hopefully you don't represent the majority of liberals, and that most of them are made of higher standards and morals. Like many of my liberal friends who believe in charity and fairness and working together ( as President Bush does) with every citizen to make America a better place..... rather than embracing an ideology bent on dividing and deceiving for personal or party gain.

It is obvious that many Americans wonder the same thing when we take Nov. 5th 2002 into consideration.

M

edit: I really don't expect an honest, straight forward answer as it is obvious you aren't capable of such when taking your performance of yesterday into account.