Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (157744)	1/9/2003 6:06:53 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1583558

voter corruption is voter corruption whether it happens once or a thousand times. I was not defending voter fraud in FLA or anywhere else, except to state that there is no evidence of a lot of it and it isn't unusual. FLA just showed up because 1 - The vote was so close and 2 - Gore decided to fight hard for recounts, which traditionaly had not been the case in close presidential elections. Had it been a Rep. party candidate in Gore's position the screaming would have been loud and clear, And with Gore in Gore's position it was also loud and clear. Whoever lost was going to have something to scream about because the election system was so bad. The recounts with the subjective counting of chads by biased counters is an obvious source of uncertainty and potential fraud and more recounts would not have eliminated this problem. and would have continued until there was a recount. unlikely.