Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (20546)	1/9/2003 7:04:52 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 57110

lol!!!!

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (20546)	1/9/2003 9:43:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 57110

Nah. That was when I punched out the judge.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (20546)	1/9/2003 10:00:52 PM
From: mph	Respond to of 57110

res_ipsa.blogspot.com This student's take on res ipsa is quite funny. Just scroll through a few of his entries to get to it: web.mit.edu This just seemed oddly appropriate: "Res ipsa loquitur literally means 'the thing speaks for itself.' When the doctrine is applied, it is not necessary for your lawyer to prove that the Defendant was negligent." Even further: "In situations where the application of res ipsa loquitur is available, the negligence of the Defendant is presumed ..." That pretty much sums up my weekends