SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vitas who wrote (677)1/10/2003 1:03:31 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Vitus, under the conditions to which you described, there's usually an arrest--not a war--that precedes such an event. Specific foreknowledge would have been great and could have saved many lives.



To: Vitas who wrote (677)1/10/2003 11:54:06 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
Hypothetical question: suppose Country X had concrete evidence that the U.S.A. was about to make un unprovoked bombing attack on Country X's civilian facilities a few months before it happened. Would you support that country to bomb the U.S.A.?

Tom



To: Vitas who wrote (677)1/13/2003 4:54:15 PM
From: zonder  Respond to of 25898
 
Evacuating WTC would be a less drastic course of action.

Of course, the downside is that there would be no oil fields for friends in Texas. Ah well...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News