Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (157807)	1/10/2003 1:50:59 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584230

You said "You don't seem to understand. He does the gaffes on his own.....whenever there is not a script around or someone to help him. He does not appear to be very bright or he is not very well informed, or both." In response to my comment - " As far as evidence goes thats not a smoking gun. Its not even a non-smoking gun. It pretty much amounts to the smoke without the gun." Which was originally made in this post Message 18424941 which was a response to " To:twfowler who wrote (157741) From: tejek Thursday, Jan 9, 2003 6:10 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 157808 I quoted all of the points where I thought the article was trying to claim evidence for the belief that Pickering is racist. I found all of the claimed evidence to be weak. I don't even see a claim in the part you just quoted. That's not surprising. Its called a smoking gun.......however, its never surprising when some people choose not to see the smoke. ted " Message 18424853 The confusion apparently arose because you quoted my post about Pickering when you replied to Tench's post about Bush. Message 18425639 Well enough confusion for tonight... Good night Ted. Tim