SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (20837)1/10/2003 10:49:14 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 104155
 
Important information for air travelers...

Tuesday, December 3, 2002

FAA Considering Passenger Ban
TheOnion.com

WASHINGTON, DC - Seeking to address "the number-one threat to airline
security," the Federal Aviation Administration announced Monday that it
will consider banning passengers on all domestic and international
commercial flights.

"In every single breach of security in recent years, whether it was an
act of terrorism or some other form of crime, it was a passenger who
subverted the safety systems on board the aircraft or in the terminal,"
FAA administrator Marion Blakey said. "Even threats that came in the
form of explosives inside baggage were eventually traced back to a
ticketed individual. As great a revenue source as they have been,
passengers simply represent too great a risk to the airline industry."

Under the proposed reforms, the FAA would institute a strict ban on
adult passengers, passengers 18 and under, international travelers, and
domestic customers. A battery of questions and ID checks will be used to
determine whether an individual is a pilot, flight attendant, or federal
security officer-the only humans who will be allowed to board an
aircraft flying within or headed for the U.S.

In addition, security sensors installed at all gates will sound an alarm
if they detect the presence of a 98.6-degree body temperature, and
airport-security workers will be trained to spot and positively identify
humans in the boarding area.

"Frankly, we've tried everything else," Blakey said. "We've put up more
metal detectors, searched carry-on luggage, and prohibited passengers
from traveling with sharp objects. Yet passengers still somehow continue
to find ways to breach security. Clearly, the passengers have to go."

If approved, the new restrictions would go into effect sometime around
Thanksgiving, before the busy holiday travel season. Customers who have
already purchased tickets for flights scheduled to take place after the
ban's enactment will receive a voucher good for travel to their final
destination by bus or train. Should such transportation prove
unavailable or inadequate, passengers on most major airlines will
receive either a portion of their airfare refunded or a coupon
redeemable for a future flight, from which they will also be banned.

"We realize that these new regulations would, for many air travelers, be
a major inconvenience," Blakey said. "But we feel strongly that it's a
small price to pay to ensure the safety of our skies."

While the ban's primary purpose would be to improve security, FAA
spokesman John Gemberling said it would help the airlines' economic
future, as well. As evidence, he pointed to the $7.7 billion losses
posted by major airlines in 2001-much of which came in the wake of Sept.
11-and the $6 billion increase in passenger-screening costs since the
tragedy.

"We've been stretched as thin as we can go," Gemberling said. "New
bag-tracking measures ensure that a passenger is on the same flight as
his or her luggage, but do little to eliminate the threat of said
passenger placing an explosive in the luggage. All bags are currently
being screened with bomb-detection machines, but even these $1 million
devices are only equipped to detect a limited range of the most
conventional explosives."

Added Gemberling: "They're certainly not going to be much help stopping
the next guy who wants to blow up a plane with something like a shoe."

Even the stiff measures included in the Aviation and Transportation
Security Act, which President Bush recently signed into law, have proven
inadequate.

"Improved explosive-detection systems, fortified cockpit doors, more
plainclothes sky marshals aboard planes, and mandatory anti-hijacking
training for flight crews-none of it could eliminate the possibility of
another Sept. 11 with 100 percent certainty," Gemberling said. "This
will."

"We've tried every possible alternative, but nothing has worked,"
Gemberling continued. "For all our efforts, we keep coming back to the
same central problem: humans."



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (20837)1/10/2003 12:01:18 PM
From: abuelita  Respond to of 104155
 
ROTFLMAO!