Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (157826)	1/10/2003 6:16:38 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580007

It amounts to evidence that either 1 - He though the defendant was getting shafted or 2 - He had sympathy for the defendant or 3 - Both. Neither is solid evidence that he is a racist. Its not zero evidence, it does meet the standards of evidence usually required by conspiracy theorists or people who have already made up their mind and who just want confirmation of their opinion, but it doesn't amount to anything that could be called solid. A person can have sympathy for a racist for many other reasons other then being a racist himself. How about if the judge called the plaintiff a nigger? Would that convince you or would you have to hear him say it before you would believe it? Well, I don't require that level of evidence to be convinced that the judge has some ambivalent views when it comes to racial issues. I hope the Dems nail him again. ted