Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (798)	1/10/2003 2:25:54 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

"calling someone a supporter of child molesters isn't libelous?" I never said he supported child molesters. That's part of your delirium. The fact is he is not a defense attorney - from what I've been told, he stutters. If he had what it takes to be a trial lawyer, he would defend whatever came his way as a public defender because someone like JLA would never be hired by a prestigious law firm. Have a nice day.

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (798)	1/10/2003 7:06:18 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

I guess it depends which definition you choose. dictionary.reference.com 2. Any defamatory writing; a lampoon; a satire. That one would put Gary Trudeau in jail. calling someone a supporter of child molesters isn't libelous? She didn't say he is a supporter child molesters. She said he "would defend" one. You are talking about facts, she is talking about a hypothetical. She talked about defending, you talked about supporting. Tom