Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (157836)	1/10/2003 2:54:49 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1580594

commentaries are so fair and balanced, they don't even bother to invite an opposing view. LOL EXCUSE ME? No opposing view? That's a laugh. Let's look at CNN: Crossfire, in which you have two biggest mouthpieces for the Clinton government against two weak liberals who couldn't say sh*t if they had a mouthful of it; Paula Zahn. Larry King. Aaron Brown. All extremist liberals, without balancing conservatives. The Capital Gang. Again, Novak, who can't get his words out. Against Shields, Carlson, and Hunt. You have 1.5 conservatives against 3 extremist liberals. Look at MSNBC: Donahue Chris Matthews That's it. Look at FOX: Brit Hume. A conservative moderator, but balanced by Mara Liason, an extremist liberal, Juan Williams a moderate liberal, Mort Kondracke, a moderate conservative, and Fred Barnes, a strong but not extreme conservative. O'Reilly, who takes the liberal side as often as the conservative. Hannity & Colmes, both good representatives of their perspectives. Greta, a liberal. ABC: Stephanopolis. That says it all. CBS: Rather. That says it all. Fox is clearly the most balanced of the networks.