Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golden_tee who wrote (8599)	1/10/2003 4:32:59 PM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 10293

Uh, I'm not Bill, so you have to ask him. See if you can address your messages to the right name if you're such an investigative hotshot.

To: golden_tee who wrote (8599)	1/12/2003 2:15:08 PM
From: Steve Felix	Respond to of 10293

Priceless: <The Mr. Clean of the Silicon Investor website > roflmao

To: golden_tee who wrote (8599)	1/12/2003 6:01:28 PM
From: S. maltophilia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Nice list of good shorts on the link you cited. Whoever is/was posting using the handle "Bill Wexler" has provided much useful insight over the years. BTW, I was always under the impression that the SI TOU did not permit revealing the true identity of another poster. I'm sure that wasn't your intent.

To: golden_tee who wrote (8599)	1/13/2003 12:21:44 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Even though its implications are completely false (I am not...or ever have been Mike Wilkins, nor do I run a hedge fund. I am an individual investor.) I am actually quite flattered. The fact that a bunch of crooks are concerned with what I have to say about the REFR stock fraud - and that they'll go to all this trouble to formulate some inane conspiracy theory - speaks volumes. By the way, I'm a bit curious about how you feel about the fact that I was 100% correct about the VLNC stock fraud?