Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (157861)	1/10/2003 6:46:39 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573968

That quote referred to a TINY chunk of my refutation of your allegation. No, that quote explicitly stated that you did not refute the allegation. I might add that you are correct, you did not refute the allegation. Coulter did lie on this matter, there is no doubt. She stated that the NY Times did not cover the story on the front page on the first day. The NY Times did cover the story on the front page on the first day. End of discussion. It is noteworthy that something was printed in the NY Times a few years ago, and you believe there is "no way to confirm" it. Tom

To: i-node who wrote (157861)	1/11/2003 8:12:27 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573968

So, the liberals say, "Well, Couric was quoting Morris so anything is okay". Of course, this is the way liberals think -- "don't concern yourself with the facts, look for a loophole". So, as a liberal, one WOULD conclude this was appropriate behavior. But to the rest of the world, Coulter's position was precisely correct -- Couric molded the facts to support her agenda. It is okay, though, becase she is a flaming liberal. Hmmmmmmm........a loophole? I think that's what Lott was looking for.......I guess he should have called a liberal, huh? ted