Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: calgal who wrote (803)	1/10/2003 11:41:58 PM
From: calgal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10965

January 10, 2003 URL:http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20030110-82837524.htm A tax cut with dividends Stephen Moore President Bush has proposed a $630 billion tax cut to help pull the economy out if its two-year, bear market rut. In releasing the plan, Mr. Bush seemed to be announcing to the nation: When it comes to tax cuts to energize the economy, size does matter. He's right. This bold plan — 5 times larger than the Democratic alternative — is exactly the right fiscal medicine at the right time. Its beneficiaries will be workers, investors, states, and cities — all of which are front-line victims of anemic economic growth rates. The centerpiece of the president's plan is elimination of the double taxation of dividends. Currently, dividend income is taxed as corporate income to the business, and then as personal income to the individual receiving the dividend. This can result in effective tax rates on dividends as high as 70 percent. These punitive tax rates, in turn, reduce stock values, capital investment, and savings. John Rutledge, a respected Wall Street economist and a former Reagan administration economist, estimates elimination of the dividend tax could cause stock values to rise by as much as 10 percent, which is good news for the 85 million American shareholders. Gary Robbins, of Fiscal Associates, says a dividend tax cut will increase gross domestic product by at least $5 for every $1 of reduced tax receipts. Even the Democratic critics of the president's plan unwittingly acknowledged the value of this plan by conceding that the plan would stimulate the stock market. What is wrong with a plan that raises the wealth holdings and retirement incomes of American stockholders, who now comprise almost half of all U.S. households? The other major feature of the Bush tax stimulus plan is to fast forward the tax cuts from the president's 2001 plan. This, too, makes good economic sense. The phased in tax cuts in the 2001 tax plan were always of questionable economic benefit. Would you go to the store today to buy a product if the store advertised that tomorrow the price will be marked down by another 20 percent? Delayed tax cuts, delay economic activity and often have exactly the opposite impact as hoped. They destimulate the economy. President Bush would accelerate his earlier tax cut. A majority of House and Senate members voted for the tax cut two years ago. Why not provide the full economic bang of the tax cut now, when the economy most desperately needs a shot of steroids? Cutting the highest income tax rates raises is especially stimulative because roughly 2 out of every 3 Americans paying the highest tax rates are small business owners. They are the wealth and job producers in our economy. One reason the U.S. economy is ailing is that business investment has fallen dramatically. Simultaneously, the U.S. venture capital industry, which provides the seed corn for new developing 21st-century companies, is almost entirely dormant today. Why the skittishness? Investors don't see the profit opportunities in new ventures. Costs are too high for new businesses thanks to government meddling; payoffs are too meager thanks to excessive taxes on capital investment — i.e. the capital-gains tax and the dividends tax. The objective of this plan is to replicate the tax cut successes of Presidents Reagan and Kennedy. It was JFK who said, "It is a paradoxical truth that when tax rates are too high the economy will never produce enough jobs or enough revenues to balance the budget." Deficit hawks in both parties will no doubt squeal that this tax plan is unaffordable and will run up the national debt. They are wrong. What Kennedy and Mr. Reagan and now George W. Bush understand clearly is that it is the absence of economic growth that causes runaway budget deficits. So let the class-warfare Democrats embrace small and impotent policy changes — changes that increasingly sophisticated investor-class voters will immediately identify as fraudulent. The obstructionist Democrats have announced they intend to fight against President Bush's genuine Republican growth package and to wage all-out class-envy warfare. President Bush has 90 million investor-class Americans on his side who realize tax rate cuts mean higher stock values and greater retirement security. Republicans must not shrink from the battle. Bring on the fight. Stephen Moore is president of the Club for Growth and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

To: calgal who wrote (803)	1/11/2003 1:32:06 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

No, I have volunteered for John Kerry because I believe he is the wisest, most honest, most electable true patriot hero to save us at this dark time in our history. Bush comes off as a hero but he has only made it darker than it needed to be. He thrives on darkness and fear though he speaks hollow words of peace and freedom. His policies do not back this up. I do not say it's black and white as Limbaugh does but it's a dark shade of gray versus a shining light with only a tinge of grey. I prefer the light. I hope he runs with McCain to put an end to blind partisanship and vicious name-calling BS. And if it is war-time then let true warrior heros like Kerry and McCain lead us, not chickenhawk pretenders. I would keep on Powell but the rest can go and we will be better off. Cheney is particular is a black hole for our country. Sheer corruption from a man I used to admire. There are others of his ilk as well, mainly hidden special interests.