Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (65481)	1/11/2003 7:24:20 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Read the report I don't need to get it translated from Danish when the NYT, which always takes a "pro-environment" approach, makes this kind of statement about it, Noel. >>> The report did not cite specific examples, but asserted that the book..... was actually "a provocative debate-generating paper." The report accuses him of "Scientific Dishonesty" but cannot name one thing he was "Dishonest" about. Because he proved the Environmentalist incorrect, he was guilty of "a provocative debate-generating paper." Now I know that in Collectivist Denmark, it is a great crime to cause a debate, but hardly dishonest. As the Author states in the NYT article, "You can't say I'm scientifically dishonest or in breach of good scientific conduct unless you point the finger and say this is the smoking gun,...It's like saying you committed murder but we won't tell you who you killed. It's impossible for me to defend myself." As I previously stated, this report is an attempt to "Slime" him.