Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (6813)	1/13/2003 10:46:58 AM
From: TrueScouse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

Claude: We had talked about Metallica briefly... Since taking a position in it again, I've taken another look at the fundamentals and the more I look at it, the more I like what I see. I agree that Noranda's decision to not do more exploration at El Morro this year is disappointing, but I presume they're just waiting for higher Cu prices. El Morro still contains about 7 billion lbs of Cu and 8 million ozs of Au which isn't going away, so I can wait a couple of few years for that one since Noranda has to pay all the bills! Meanwhile, I think there could be some very positive developments at Cerro San Pedro in Mexico this year. I checked on Glamis' website (since GLG is the 50% JV partner and operator at Cerro San Pedro). Their revised feasibility study shows future production of 80,000 oz Au per year at a total cash cost of $125/oz. Permitting and final engineering studies are completed. The project is "ready to go". At $300 POG they estimated an IRR of 20%, which would presumably be even better at $350 POG. And then there's an interesting note included in Glamis' recent slide presentation on the status of Cerro San Pedro: "Discussions with Joint Venture partner to determine optimum means of proceeding". i.e. They want to "proceed". My suspicion is that Glamis sees 50% of Cerro San Pedro as too small for two companies to be involved and is discussing with MR that one or the other should take over the full 100% and get the project started asap. If this happens, IMHO it would be very beneficial to MR, whether it gets the mine or gets paid for its 50%. MR's 50% share of the San Pedro deposit is about 1 million oz AuE, and with $4 million in the bank and no debt, I don't see much downside from here -- with lots of potential and the massive deposit at El Morro "thrown in for free". I may be way off base here, but I'm betting that this could be a good year for Metallica. Please let me know if you think this doesn't make any sense! Thanks, Howy