SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : IQ Chart: SI's Real-Time Technical Charting Software -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Busby who wrote (3454)1/12/2003 7:59:26 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo  Respond to of 4093
 
John....no split at all...but a complete redo of the index, and selecting 5000 as a new starting value on the 9th. I assume that, as has been the case with readjustments of other indexes in the past, that comparable data for past dates would be calculated and made available......but I haven't seen anything confirming that that would indeed be done..........maybe that won't be done, in which event, off-hand. seems to me the best solution for IQC might just be to drop the back data altogether and just start a new series from 5000 - which would at least have useable technical indicators etc. from that point on.......All data services will be facing the same problem, so guess you would want to check out what others are doing before deciding on IQC approach.

Incidentally, noticed this in weekend Barron's..

<<The New York Stock Exchange Composite Index was reconfigured last week. More than 700 issues that are not common stocks, such as closed-end funds and preferred shares, were eliminated. The index was recalibrated at the starting level of 5000 as of Thursday, from around 485.>>

.............BTW.....What are you doing working on Sunday??
...................................Henry



To: John Busby who wrote (3454)1/12/2003 8:31:34 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4093
 
John........Further stray thoughts.........re your mention of reverse 10 to one split, I suppose the whole thing could be treated as a split. If 5000 is taken as equal to the 01/08 close at 485.12, that would work out as a 1:10.305241 split. If the computers can handle that, maybe that would be the way for the data-feeders to go.....VBG....................Henry