Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (1007)	1/12/2003 7:34:04 PM
From: Stevefoder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

A lot of people that are for leaving Iraq alone seem to use the following logic: 1. We can not prove Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, therefore we should not invade. 2. If we do invade, then there will be too many casualties since Saddam will use his weapons of mass destruction.

To: jlallen who wrote (1007)	1/12/2003 8:19:17 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

I disagree, the tactic that I saw was not meant primarily to defame, but was used as a verbal/written intimidation to silence her opponents. Whether it is asserting that you would defend a child molester, or that MD has racist views or that I am a stalker, it is all meant to divert attention away from the argument and put each on the defensive in a personal way. I consider it on par with a woman crying "rape" because a guy disagrees with her in an argument. disgusting. Oops, guess I was supposed to post this over here Message 18435911