SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (18503)1/13/2003 6:48:10 AM
From: que seria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
Excellent article by Roach, but that's the norm. Note also
the interesting article (1st of 2) by Jen, on currencies. His bottom line:

The USD is still grossly overvalued, in my view. We have reported that the size of the misalignment is around 15-20%. But valuation is a ‘stock’ concept. To complement the valuation calculations, we revive a ‘flow’ based calculation to assess the size of the USD correction needed to normalise the C/A deficit. With the assumption that the long-run sustainable C/A deficit is around 2.5% of GDP, rather than the current 5.0%, and assuming that the US and the rest of the world revert back to more reasonable growth rates rather than what we witnessed in the late-1990s, the USD, we calculate, will need to correct by a little more than 20%. This figure is in the same ballpark as the size of the misalignment we computed. The larger the fiscal stimulus, the larger the C/A deficit, and the larger the USD correction necessary to normalise this balance.

I suspect that most people won't seriously consider buying gold or gold stocks until they connect US$ weakness to the price rises in things they have to have, or are used to buying. That's a ways off, except for energy (a supply/demand story), and meanwhile the dollar may correct up. There remains time to place your bets. I'm much closer to being a gold stock seller than a buyer here, at least with my producers as opposed to junior explorers.