SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (1209)1/14/2003 1:30:36 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 25898
 
Incredible 2-party, yes <The Usual Suspects invited:>

Ouch, that capital decapitation, as well as the only one using
the Westinghouse-GE executioners current.

<Gee, that oppressive dictatorship, Britain, looks like it's almost only 2 parties:>

Flaunting your ignorance on the UK dilemma they have been working on for decades??

As wel as the regular definition on 2-party systems, in and outside the representive, elected
institutions. (OK, I admit, that was clearly too difficult too)

<But just in case you missed it in your benighted ignorance, the US does in fact have quite a few political parties:>

Yes, lots of thrid parties, really the funniest of the funnies of seats in the congress, but clearly
within the frameworks of regular USA ignorance.

<And if you believe it is impossible to have a working democracy with only 2 parties, you are dumber than I thought. >

Yes, unfettered ignorance is unfettered, globally, but luckily there is only one pure 2-party system left
behind centuries of history, carefully guarded by censorship.

Ilmarinen

Btw, the censorship was lifted some 7-8 years ago in UK, despite no constitution on freedom of the
press, but re-instated very fast. However, lots of little droppings left on the internet for anyone
with access to a search engine, and only skilled in one language.

Btw, between those somewhat 2-party systems, not as pure as USA, Canada is much more
interesting than UK, who is working really hard to reform.

That is, if one isn't really interested in Malta.

That is, to get some info in the native language, try a search on "proportional representation"
and concentrate on UK, or on USA up to the 30-40s.

That was how it kind of started in the early 1800s for the angloamerican world.
Another possibility is to ask Nadina why Israel does not have a 2-party system,
although the same question can be made to any non-anglo-american citizen
or colonialist.

In case you have really severe problems with that early 1800s thing called proportional
representation, you can always try me.