SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Coyne who wrote (342579)1/13/2003 3:45:45 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
We are taking about a very small number of people. Drugs are tested to 1 in what number for safety. What number in a thousand does one use to define something carcinogenic.

Of the few % who are of concern, what number in a thousand should one consider carcinogenic. If the condition leads to extinction, what number should be used.

If we don't know, what is the only course that protects children.

I give a relative perspective of safety.



To: George Coyne who wrote (342579)1/13/2003 3:48:25 PM
From: SeachRE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The "scientific work" ,you dumb g-c is referring to, is done by people with an ax to grind, i.e., plenty of self-fulfilling prophecies by homosexuals themselves. I have nothing against the former. Consenting adults behind closed doors do not concern me per se. TAW has a more accurate understanding of the issue. Shuddap!



To: George Coyne who wrote (342579)1/13/2003 4:31:09 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
No, I don't believe he has seen the math....