Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gsp6181 who wrote (7034)	1/13/2003 11:17:53 PM
From: GrillSgt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

Yes it applies both ways. I have not seen it fail since early oct. It has been dead on.

To: gsp6181 who wrote (7034)	1/14/2003 12:05:13 AM
From: velociraptor_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

Gaps are usually filled but not always. Chrysler stock has a gap from the mid 1970's that was never filled for example. I would hate to wait 30 years for that gap and still be waiting. Gaps should be taken in context. The more of them you have below and the closer they are, the more likely they will be filled for sure. Timing is the only guesswork. Huge gaps are almost always at least partially filled soon after, but again, don't count on it as a plan because it could take a while as well. I would look at how overbought/oversold something is and what kind of volume is associated with it too and whether there are any divergences building in some of the indicators.