SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonder who wrote (2183)1/13/2003 4:31:42 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15987
 
Demanding to return to a homeland that you never lived in, nor did your parents, is about as clear an example of an historical claim as I can think of.

I don't think Germany, France, England or Croatia would take very seriously my claim to have a "right of return" based on ancestry.



To: zonder who wrote (2183)1/13/2003 5:16:51 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15987
 
I am not sure if demanding to return to your home land (like the Greek Cypriots are now doing) is the same thing as a "historical claim" by a nation to a territory, kicking out the current inhabitants.

How many generations marks the cutoff between "home land" and "historical"?

It's like the Israeli, who being accused of not letting the Palestinian refugees return to their homeland, asked,

"The refugees should come back after 50 years?"

"Yes."

"After 100 years?"

"Yes."

"After 1000 years?"

"Yes."

"After 2000 years?"

"Yes!"

"That's me. I came back."

Another argument that always seems to work in one direction only.