SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank Pembleton who wrote (25486)1/13/2003 10:36:45 PM
From: jim black  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36161
 
No need to apologize, Frank. I bit hook, line, and sinker, swallowing the whole damned thing, last week. In retrospect and upon rereading it I am convinced that that is a plan that is enough to scare the sh*t out of anyone...simple, plausible, executable, nefarious and worthy of the muslim mindset toward the 21st century and all of us without rags. Let us all hope and pray they not get this idea in their heads. I still insist nukes would be EASY to get into the port of Seattle and a longtime INS agent there has had me worried about it for years, there simply being no way the US can monitor thousands of shipping crates that arrive there everyweek, unsearched, unmonitored. To say that such worries are paranoid is equivalent to having the exact DNA as a large bird that sticks its head in the sand
jim black



To: Frank Pembleton who wrote (25486)1/14/2003 7:09:21 AM
From: Nelson958  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36161
 
Jim Sinclairs comment:Here is an excerpt of the translation of a controversial interview, a copy of which was sent to me in December 2002. The interview was pulled by its publisher with the excuse it was a hoax. Unfortunately, I am informed reliably that it was not.

Nelson