Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Charles Swope who wrote (62681)	1/14/2003 10:13:01 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Maybe. We'll have to see. If Dell is going after the low end, then it may not effect Cisco's margins as much as you might think, because Cisco gets most of its revenues (and customers) from the high end equipment. In Marketing 101, they taught us that price is the last thing you compete on when you've run out of the ability to compete on everything else. Then in Econ 101, they taught us that price matters only in demand elastic markets. First, this market is for networking gear, which is very temperamental and requires complex software and a high level of expertise to install, operate and maintain effectively. In the high end of the market, enterprise and service provider companies prefer to rely on the best equipment and price is a secondary or tertiary consideration. In other words, demand is inelastic and price doesn't matter. Second, Cisco only competes on price when they don't have the best product or if a competitor's product is of similar quality. In addition, Cisco many times doesn't have to compete on price even in those cases due to the high level of service and customer attention that they give their customers. Then top it off with the software that makes the dump hardware actually work. Software isn't easy in the networking business and Cisco has 15 years of experience over Dell in this area. So Dell has some tough sledding ahead. They can carve out a niche, but it will take time. I remember when the same ballyhoo emerged when Intel decided they were going to compete in networking. Well, so far they haven't made much of a dent on Cisco either. Anyway, I don't want to take anything away from Dell. They are a great company and they can be a player. But let's not exclaim the fall of Cisco just yet. :)

To: M. Charles Swope who wrote (62681)	1/14/2003 11:26:26 AM
From: MHA	Respond to of 77400

Dell is OEM'ing 3Com switches. Before they were selling HP but had to break that relationship b/c of Compaq. Given 3Com's history, Dell has a long way to go. Also, switches are one part of an enterprise network, Cisco dominates in Fortune 500 because it is the only vendor that provides end-to-end solution (multi-layer switches, routers, firewall, VPN, SAN, content switch, and more). As an IT manager the more equipment I have from different vendors the more costly it is to maintain/support.