Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (66114)	1/15/2003 11:29:27 AM
From: FaultLine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I did, which is why the URL's are not emboldened. Yes you did (see below). Hmmm, perhaps someone would like to explain why the last sentence is emboldened... Message 18443109 --fl Blanks added in the HTML for readability ======= On Jan. 27 Blix will present his findings to the Security Council. They will be equivocal. He already told the Security Council yesterday that he found no smoking gun. (Surprise!) Blix's report will call for endless more inspections and will be seized upon by defenders of the status quo on the Security Council to deny the legitimacy of American military action. It will then be Powell's duty to discount the Blix charade -- to point out, for example, that Blix has not taken a single Iraqi scientist out of the country for interrogation free from Iraqi coercion -- and to explain why America cannot be deterred by it.< p > Or is charade Powell's intention, the way to vindicate his misgivings about Gulf War I and to ensure that Saddam Hussein's regime remains merely contained -- and intact?< /b >< p > < a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35858-2003Jan9.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35858-2003Jan9.html< /a >< p > Well, no gratuitous slam at Clinton there. < /span > < br >< /td > < /tr > < /table >