Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Coyne who wrote (343624)	1/15/2003 9:38:06 PM
From: goldworldnet	Respond to of 769670

Right or wrong, people want a few representatives that look a little bit the way they do. The real challenge is to make people feel truly equal, so equal in fact, that they don't want a handout. * * *

To: George Coyne who wrote (343624)	1/15/2003 9:42:09 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

the strong conservative case for true "color blindness". You can't go from separate and very unequal directly to color blindness without a corrective action period factored in. The conservative case seems to be not to allow any correction, not to allow any goal, and then label that as ideal when in fact it just perpetuates the inequality. One should not confuse the process of getting to equal with the goal of equality, which would require no further process. TP

To: George Coyne who wrote (343624)	1/15/2003 9:54:49 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well I would say that if one uses the dictionary, there can only be a strong liberal case for true "color blindness". That's common sense to an extreme liberal like me. And if you look liberal up, you will be very hard pressed to find any democrat you can call a liberal. narrow minded, intolerant, dogmatic, authoritarian attitudes .... that the dems. But dems do seem to have a lot of Obsolete liberals.. liberal. Obsolete. Morally unrestrained; licentious.