SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (10956)1/16/2003 8:49:16 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Deflation downright daunting

Don Bauder

January 16, 2003

The latest buzzword is "reflation" – arriving slowly.

Increasingly, economists and analysts are concluding that the world's central banks are terrified of global deflation. Ergo, they will reflate – flood the world with liquidity.

Yesterday's news that the Producer Price Index was flat in December and down 0.3 percent excluding food and fuel will heighten deflation fears. For 2002, the index was down 0.4 percent excluding food and fuel.

With reflation, bond yields will rise and bond prices go down. Gold could continue up. Real estate could thrive if rates don't rise too much. And stocks might jump initially, although they will eventually suffer from rising interest rates.

But not all economists agree on these points.

In his January letter, bond guru Bill Gross of Pimco Total Return Fund in Newport Beach sees a "global grand scheme. The economic world's disparate interests are currently aligned because (of) a common enemy: deflation."

Such trends as globalization, excessive debt and China's surplus of cheap labor have raised deflation fears.

Japan cut its interest rates almost to zero. The U.S. Federal Reserve made 12 cuts in the federal funds rate, bringing it down to a paltry 1.25 percent. The European Central Bank is more cautious but has brought rates to below 3 percent.

The United States isn't admitting it, but it's aiming for a gradually weakening dollar, Gross says. That would be inflationary.

"Every weapon in the global arsenal will be fired at some future point to prevent declining prices and a concomitant economic collapse," Gross says. Reflation will mean that yields on Treasury paper will go up, bringing prices down, but this won't come quickly, he says.

Bert Dohmen of the Los Angeles-based Wellington Letter says, "Reflation will be the important, long-term trend worldwide over the next several years." Therefore, gold will continue to rise, he says.

But, like Gross, he says inflation won't come back quickly. Stocks will do well selectively, and are no sure thing, Dohmen says. Companies with good cash flows and dividends – including some utilities and telecoms – look good, he says. Homebuilding stocks look good.

But overall, "the trend for the next several years will be 'stuff,' rather than paper assets," Dohmen says. Many other commodities should do well, along with gold.

"There is a lot of reflation already out there," says Gary Schlossberg of Wells Capital Management in San Francisco. "The dollar's decline contributed to a rise in industrial commodity prices. Pricing power for big corporations should improve over the year."

He looks for a rise in bond yields of about three-quarters of a percentage point, and that will hurt bond investors, although there will be a snapback at some point.

In the gentle reflation, "there will be a friendlier environment for equities," Schlossberg says.

Ross Starr of the University of California San Diego says Japan will fight deflation by setting targets for low inflation. The U.S. Fed is ready to do the same if things worsen, but that isn't likely.

"Europe, Japan and the U.S. would be more prosperous if the U.S. had a higher inflation rate now, but the U.S. won't inflate to benefit the world," Starr says.

In any case, as the economy recovers, bond prices will fall, he says.

Hogwash, hogwash, hogwash, says A. Gary Shilling, economist of Springfield, N.J., reacting to reflationary talk. Deflation – not reflation – will be the dominant force of the next decade.

What about all that money the central banks will be printing to defeat deflation? "You can lead the money horse to water, but you can't make him drink," harrumphs Shilling, noting that the Fed's 12 interest rate cuts didn't create inflation or recovery.

"They can flood the banks with money, but the banks are scared to lend and creditworthy borrowers don't want to borrow," Shilling says. "So we're pushing on a string."

The dollar's weakness will only be temporary, he says.

He notes that all the liquidity created by Japan hasn't brought inflation. That nation is still deflating. Shilling still likes bonds.

"There are not many of us who like bonds," he says, but he is frequently doing battle with the consensus, and is quite often right, as in recent years.

He likes some stocks, particularly regional banks. "They can borrow short at lower rates, and lend long at nice spreads," also pay decent dividends, and there is a possibility of takeovers," Shilling says.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don Bauder: (619) 293-1523; don.bauder@uniontrib.com



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (10956)1/17/2003 11:53:35 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
slatkinfraud.com

slatkinfraud.com



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (10956)1/17/2003 9:40:43 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
BCSC Eron figure Chambers called an "intolerable" danger
B.C. Securities Commission *BCSC
Thursday January 16 2003 Street Wire..


by Brent Mudry
Controversial former Vancouver lawyer Martin Chambers, an alleged drug money launderer and organized crime associate, faces strong opposition from the U.S. government in his latest bid to win bail from jail, which has been his home for the past five months. In a new court filing in Miami supported by top-secret sealed documents, authorities claim Mr. Chambers presents a serious threat to parties involved the case.
"To be sure, with respect to the defendant, potential witnesses in this case have expressed their concerns for safety to the law enforcement agents in the United States and Canada," states Assistant United States Attorney Richard Hong in a filing dated Monday. "As the court previously observed, moreover, there has been a credible death threat made to one of the defendants in this case. As a result of the threat, that defendant was relocated to an undisclosed place. The threat was not viewed as an idle one."
In addition, "the law enforcement agents have encountered people who have declined to step forward to even acknowledge their acquaintance of the defendant on the basis of their concerns for safety," states Mr. Hong, the lead prosecutor in the money laundering part of the Bermuda Short case.
Mr. Hong argues that "this is not a close case." "There is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant continues to pose a substantial danger to the community. He should continue to be pretrial detained."
To support his argument, the prosecutor has filed several sealed documents -- an affidavit and "certain law enforcement reports" -- which were also mailed to Mr. Chambers's two American lawyers: Donald Re of Los Angeles and Gerald Houlihan of Miami, on Monday. This is the first time defence lawyers have seen any part of the secret RCMP and FBI dossiers on Mr. Chambers, as similar documents were sealed last fall in an ex parte bail hearing voir dire, and Mr. Chambers failed in a subsequent bid to overturn the court sealing order.
"As fully detailed in the reports and affidavit, the defendant's pretrial release from the Federal Detention Center in Miami, regardless of the conditions of release, would pose a serious and intolerable danger to the community, including to the potential witnesses in this case," states Mr. Hong.
The prosecutor also argues that a defence bid to spring Mr. Chambers with a curfew and electronic monitoring is much too risky to even consider. "The defendant and his family can theoretically leave the jurisdiction by an airplane, small boat and/or car, with the use of fake identification cards/passports commonly available in Miami, to another non-extraditable, offshore jurisdiction, and would not be missed by a supervising pretrial service officer until long after the defendant and his family are esconced in a safe haven."
Mr. Hong further argues that even if fool-proof security could be ensured, Mr. Chambers has failed to provide his true financial condition so that an appropriate and substantial bond amount can even be considered. The only financial documentation Mr. Chambers has presented the U.S. government is his Canadian tax returns for 2000 and 2001, in which he declared net income of $40,962 (Cdn.) and $86,256 (Cdn.), respectively. (Oddly, the U.S. government notes Mr. Chambers claimed to live in Edmonton in Alberta, although most court records suggest he lives in B.C.)
"These modest reported incomes are inconsistent with his prior claims of being a 'successful businessman,' with substantial income and assets, as previously reported to the pretrial service officer in St. Louis, and as he stated on audiotapes regarding his properties in Winter Harbour, British Columbia," states Mr. Hong. "Defendant's submission of the tax returns, without more, only raises more questions about the defendant's veracity regarding the disclosure of his financial resources."
The U.S. government also argues that Mr. Chambers has no legitimate business to tend to outside of jail. "Defendant also raises claims that he cannot continue his 'legitimate business' while being in FDC-Miami and that he cannot prepare for his defence for trial at FDC-Miami. First, as the United States explained at the defendant's initial appearance in August, 2002, the defendant's business is money laundering," states Mr. Hong.
"In the audiotape and videotape evidence in this case, the defendant stated that he was in the business of laundering money. He stated to the undercover agents that he could handle a substantial amount of drug proceeds to launder through the international banking system, not just hundreds of thousands of dollars, but millions of dollars. This money laundering business is at the heart of the defendant's 'legitimate business.'"
While Mr. Chambers has not yet unveiled his defence, his long-time Vancouver criminal defence lawyer Howard Rubin presented an affidavit, quoted by prosecutor Mr. Hong. Mr. Rubin claims the audiotape and videotape evidence detailing the alleged narcotics money laundering transactions is actually "consistent with legitimate Canadian insolvency business and the refinancing of insolvent properties and commercial transitions (sic), the bulk of his business for the past 20 years and, in particular, the setting up of companies, Trusts, Professional and Banking relationships in the Caribbean for the creation of a 2nd Mortgage Fund and High Return Pool for restructuring purposes."
bmudry@stockwatch.com

(c) Copyright 2003 Canjex Publishing Ltd. stockwatch.com