Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (21221)	1/16/2003 7:36:29 PM
From: Dutch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 104155

Wage War only if Saddam has weapons...do you really think we have had ample time to find them. These people are not stupid, have the $ means to hide anything and are not exactly trust worthy. All the anti-war jargon is coming from the anti-Bush crowd. It is the dems opportunity to topple Bush in the midst of his lowest popularity poll yet. JMO

To: stockman_scott who wrote (21221)	1/16/2003 11:22:16 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 104155

Thoughts on "anti-war sentiment" . . . . . . . . When is the last time anti-war protests occurred for a war that had not even begun? This "war" is the biggest hoax in years. In fact, 2002 will be remembered as the "year of the hoaxes." Has anyone caught a glimpse of those two cloned babies? In fact, Dubya was "elected" in an election hoax. The 2002 mid-term elections were a con job based on multiple hoaxes. This whole century has been a hoax. Didn't the Naz hit 5000 early in 2000? just rambling, john