Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SBHX who wrote (1808)	1/17/2003 5:23:37 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

How can you destroy what you're not able to account for? What if the US wanted to destroy the weapons it lost track of--would it be able to do so? And how would the US recordkeeping be if it had to undergo two wars (Iran and the US) as well as civil skirmishes (both the Kurds and Shiites)? Let's be clear here. Were those discovered weapons loaded with chemicals and testing proved recent activity relative to the handling of those rockets, you might find me closer to your position. But this is not the case. But we're not being told that this is the case. I'm sorry to report that I think Americans are being propaganderized by the American media. Why? Because repeatedly there's a failure on the part of the American media to mention those rockets were sealed and unopened and had expired. Instead the viewer is treated to a continuum of retired generals and a retinue supposed military expert analysts who're making statements like, "if it's proven the chemicals were recently in those rocket heads ... blah, blah and more blah." Others less generous have called it the "smoking gun." Please show me where I'm wrong.