Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (14590)	1/20/2003 9:57:11 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Oh OK. The reason why we cannot even talk using the same terminology is because I am "goofy" and not that you know so little about the subject that you think a singularity is a particle??? you "fluctuate" your terms so often. Show where I have done that. I asked this before, and you could not support your allegation. Spontaneous generation rules, you go girl! A pathetic attempt at ridiculing observed and documented phenomena. Again, it is called "quantum fluctuation", not "spontaneous generation". I posted several links, but I guess they were too complicated for you. One was Stephen Hawking's explanation of particles appearing in vacuum by themselves, and the other was the Casimir Effect, explained by the appearance of particles in vacuum. I can live with you being incapable of reading and understanding quantum physics. Just don't try to make fun of matters you do not understand.